While Ford's claim that it is the wheel manufacturer's issue may be 100% true, we still need to drive on the interstate. Chevy is still using the old tires and their vehicles aren't having any problems. Ford claims that it is a problem with the wheel manufacturer and the owners should contact them. Ford changed the tires and now they can't drive on the interstate. This would be like them changing the asphalt on the roads and urging car manufacturers to change the tires they use. As it is now, we can't even tell them because support is non existent for Fusion and I am certainly not going to pay an additional 50 USD just to file a bug report. Users should never ever have to poke around those settings, it should just work! VMWare should be aware of the issue and resolve it once and for all by pushing a patch. It is more complicated, as bridging is a layer 2 function, routing and NAT is layer 3, etc. However, this doesn't work for network bridges, which for some reason also pop up now, even when you are selecting "NAT" for the VM. If (as it should be) you are using NAT on your VM network settings, there should simply be another utunY device and you can "teach" your Mac to also NAT that behind the VPN. However, your VMs are not aware of this change, and your Mac as a host doesn't know, where to pass on the packages that come in from the VMs, so they end up in Nirvana. Your VPN software creates a virtual network adaptor for that, called utunX. In other words, once you connect your VPN, all your traffic is routed through that new connection. When you connect your VPN, many configurations (and most corporate ones) don't allow split tunneling. In my case the solution was just to redownload and run the Cisco VPN software within the client as suggested by VMware, but this is not a long term fix and likely would not work for people who need to have A) a separate VPN service for the client while still needing Cisco VPN on the host or B) be able to access the Cisco VPN on both host and client at the same time.While I have no solution to it, I can explain, why this is happening Note that for me, restarting Windows within the VM does not seem to work consistently, it needs to be fully shut down and started up again. If I quit Cisco on the host and shutdown the Windows VM and start it up again, I have no issues sharing non-VPN internet with the VM. When the Cisco VPN software is opened or running on the host (regardless of connection status) when the Windows VM boots up, the network connection is broken (with the exception of DNS for some reason). I've locked the issue down to my use of Cisco Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client. I am also experiencing this issue (Host: Mac OS 11.1, VMware Fusion: 12.1.0, Client: Windows 10 fully updated). I have multiple VPNs defined in my host at the same time even if everything is turned off, guest VM don't have internet anyway. Once i enabled it, my VM had network connectivity right away.Īs i'm not an expert in this area, but i thought that these extensions are deprecated in Big Sur, but somehow this change fixed the issue with Parallels at least.Ĭonsidering this, I think that similar issue is with Fusion (i'm running latest 12.1) that it somehow can't handle new way of operation (macos apis) and perhaps can't deal with my mac host network or something about that. However, in parallels forum there was a recommendation about changing some parameter in parallels config that triggered "system extension blocked" dialog. So, apparently something is not right on my mac host. I also tried to use the same VM in Parallels 16.1 and got problem with network adapter during startup (no internet again in VM). I'm not 100% sure if this was the trigger, but at least i noticed the problem after these changes. It was working for a while (don't remember if NAT/bridged) but then i added new VPN connection (mac built-in) and since that time i VM internet connection failed. My VM (win10) does not have internet connection in any mode NAT or bridged now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |